[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530072712.GA20140@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:27:12 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/6] time: keep track of the pending utc/tai
threshold
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:23:27PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 11:19 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:56:18PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >>On 05/29/2012 10:11 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> >>>On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 06:49:30PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >>>>diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> >>>>index 6e46cac..81c76a9 100644
> >>>>--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> >>>>+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> >>>>@@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(cycle_t offset, int shift)
> >>>> timekeeper.xtime.tv_sec++;
> >>>> leap = second_overflow(timekeeper.xtime.tv_sec);
> >>>> timekeeper.xtime.tv_sec += leap;
> >>>>+ timekeeper.wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec -= leap;
> >>>Don't you need this in update_wall_time() too?
> >>Yep. Good point.
> >Okay, so I can confirm that this fixes the CLOCK_MONOTONIC timer issue
> >during a leap second.
> Thanks! Is it ok if I add your Tested-by: to the patch?
Yes, by all means, thanks.
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists