[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530090844.GA23663@liondog.tnic>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:08:44 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, andi@...stfloor.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 mce: use new printk recursion disabling interface
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:07:59AM +0800, ShuoX Liu wrote:
> Boris,
> I checked code and found some other functions in do_machine_check() also
> would printk something. Such as add_taint(). So i think we'd better
> place the recursion check at the beginning and the end of
> do_machine_check(). Also more printks later(maybe) added will benefit
> from this. Do you agree?
I'm not sure we want to disable printk recursion for add_taint() - it
doesn't spit out any useful information wrt MCE so we could ignore it.
Btw, I forgot to ask: this printk recursion disabling, do you have a
real usecase where you don't get the MCE info in dmesg and with your
patch it works or is this purely hypothetical?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists