linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] expose per-taskgroup schedstats in cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1338376967.26856.262.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2012 13:22:47 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...nvz.org, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, handai.szj@...il.com,
	Andrew.Phillips@...x.com, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] expose per-taskgroup schedstats in cgroup

On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:48 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +static u64 tg_idle(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
> +{
> +       u64 val;
> +
> +       if (tg != &root_task_group) {
> +               val = cfs_read_sleep(tg->se[cpu]);
> +               /* If we have rt tasks running, we're not really idle */
> +               val -= rt_rq(exec_clock, tg, cpu);
> +       } else
> +               /*
> +                * There are many errors here that we are accumulating.
> +                * However, we only provide this in the interest of having
> +                * a consistent interface for all cgroups. Everybody
> +                * probing the root cgroup should be getting its figures
> +                * from system-wide files as /proc/stat. That would be faster
> +                * to begin with...
> +                *
> +                * Ditto for steal.
> +                */
> +               val = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE] * TICK_NSEC;

You just violated 2 coding style rules in one go :-)

If one side of the if-else has braces, the other side should have too.
If a block is multi-line (regardless of multi-stmt) it should have
braces.

/me hands you a bucket full of {}.

> +       return val;
> +} 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/