[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC60D9D.8080705@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:07:57 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<handai.szj@...il.com>, <Andrew.Phillips@...x.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] add a new scheduler hook for context switch
On 05/30/2012 03:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> /me cries a little.. I was hoping to fix put_prev_task.. see:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/16/487
>
> (I've actually got a 4 patch split out of that if anybody cares)
>
> Its just one of those things stuck behind the -ENOTIME tree :/
>
> The plan is to 'merge' put_prev_task and pick_next_task into one and
> avoid a lot of the up-down walking.
>
> You just added a constraint for always having to walk the entire thing
> up -- cgroups is too damn expensive already, we should be trimming this
> nonsense not bloating it.
if they are merged, then I don't need a new hook.
Do you have plans to do it? I'd be happy to continue the work if you
lack the time, since I am directly interested in the functionality.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists