linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] Also record sleep start for a task group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1338381877.26856.272.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2012 14:44:37 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, handai.szj@...il.com,
	Andrew.Phillips@...x.com, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] Also record sleep start for a task group

On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:24 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> sleep_start is not for iowait. This is for idle. And I know no other way 
> to collect idle time per cgroup, other than the time during which it was 
> out of the runqueue.
> 
> Now what you say about the sleepers don't make that much sense for idle 
> because this information is per-cpu as well.
> 
> When the se is being dequeued, it means none of its children is running 
> on that runqueue. That's idle. 

But does that mean the cgroup is idle? Its impossible to re-construct
the machine state from this per-cpu data if your definition of
cgroup-idle is the time when _all_ cpus are idle.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/