[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC6180F.9020009@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:52:31 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<handai.szj@...il.com>, <Andrew.Phillips@...x.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] expose fine-grained per-cpu data for cpuacct stats
On 05/30/2012 04:48 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
> a) the information in /proc/stat is actually much denser since it's
> "cpu VAL VAL VAL VAL" as opposed to "cpuX.FIELD VAL"
easily fixable here. Less descriptive, but we can use a header line
with the description much like how /proc/slabinfo does, and we still
have an extensible interface that is dense, at the same time.
> b) If it became a problem the /proc/stat case is actually fairly
> trivially fixable by defining each cpu as a record and "everything
> else" as a magic im-out-of-cpus value.
>
>> >
>> > Now, if you guys are okay with a file per-cpu, I can do it as well.
>> > It pollutes the filesystem, but at least protects against the fact that this
>> > is kmalloc-backed.
>> >
> As I prefaced, I'm not sure there's much that can be trivially done
> about it. This is really a fundamental limitation of how read_map()
> works.
>
> What we really need is a proper seq_file exposed through cftypes.
That can be done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists