[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530150827.GA12109@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:08:27 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"'xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com'" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen/mce: Add mcelog support for Xen platform (RFC)
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 03:09:12PM +0000, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
> >
> > Still no go, this is current linus with your patch applied. I'll look
> > into it
> > later when there's time.
>
> The root cause is,
> 1). at cpu/mcheck/mce.c, device_initcall_sync(mcheck_init_device) is *after* all device_initcall();
> 2). at cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c, device_initcall(threshold_init_device) will
> threshold_init_device
> --> threshold_create_device
> --> threshold_create_bank
> --> kobject_create_and_add(name, &dev->kobj);
> // at this point, struct device *dev = per_cpu(mce_device, cpu), which is a NULL pointer.
> // mce_device is initialized at mcheck_init_device --> mce_device_create
> 3). so kernel panic
>
> So our RFC patch would affect amd mce logic.
>
> ===========================
>
> I have a thought about symlink approach, but seems it would bring more issues, e.g.
> 1). it need change more native mce code, like remove /dev/mcelog which created at native mce (under xen platform), or
> 2). it still need to change device_initcall(mcheck_init_device) to device_initcall_sync(mcheck_init_device), if it want to implicitly block native /dev/mcelog --> but that would panic amd mce logic.
>
> IMO currently there are 2 options:
> 1). use the original approach (implicitly redirect /dev/mcelog to xen_mce_chrdev_device) --> what point of this approach do you think unreasonable? It just remove a 'static' from native mce code!
> 2). use another /dev/xen-mcelog interface, with another misc minor '226'
The 2) is no good.
3) What about moving the corresponding other users (so threshold_init_device),
to be at late_initcall and the mce to be at late_initcall_sync
4) Or make the driver you are making start at fs_initcall ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists