[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC63996.9040706@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:15:34 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, mingo@...e.hu,
jeremy@...p.org, tglx@...utronix.de, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org#3.4+
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/amd: fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity
systems
On 05/30/2012 08:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> Xen does trap and emulate (possibly just ignore) both instructions.
>
Then why the fsck is there paravirt_crap on this?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists