linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab/mempolicy: always use local policy from interrupt context v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120530163246.GF9850@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2012 09:32:46 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab/mempolicy: always use local policy from interrupt
 context v3

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:40:39AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 8 May 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > > But this doesn't mean NAK anyway.
> > > >
> > > >  Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> > >
> > > Sigh, this was acked by Christoph and KOSAKI when the logic is reversed
> > > and does the exact opposite of what's intended?
> >
> > Ping? Anyone going to send a fixed up patch?
> 
> I thought this was done and fixed in another email thread?

Yes the latest patch was final. But I can resend.

-Andi
> 

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/