[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530173247.GC15635@x1.osrc.amd.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2012 19:32:48 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, jeremy@...p.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/amd: fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD
 Trinity systems
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:17:54PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Yes, the following patch also fixed the crash for us:
> > 
> > Implement rdmsr_regs and wrmsr_regs for Xen pvops.
> 
> That needs more data. Such as the reason for it, the crash
> tombstone, and an analysis of the bug.
> 
> But at this point I am not sure what we are going to do.
> 
> I think Peter leans towards ripping the .rdmsr_regs/wdmsr_regs
> function out altogether (so altering the amd_rdmsr... to use the
> .rdmsr/.wrdmsr). At which point I think this would all work
> just fine?
I wouldn't do that. Andre's patch switches to the
rdmsrl_safe/checking_wrmsrl functions so you don't need to implement the
_regs functions for pvops.
I'll send it now with corrected commit message.
> I am tempted to write a patch that checks all the pv-cpu-ops to see if
> there are any that are NULL and throw a warning so that this does not
> hit us in the future - to be at least more proactive about this sort
> of thing.
This could be a prudent thing to do.
-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
