[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530181515.GB20130@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:15:15 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pidns: find_new_reaper() can no longer switch to
init_pid_ns.child_reaper
find_new_reaper() changes pid_ns->child_reaper, see add0d4df
"pid_ns: zap_pid_ns_processes: fix the ->child_reaper changing".
The original reason has gone away after the previous patch,
->children list must be empty after zap_pid_ns_processes().
However now we can not switch to init_pid_ns.child_reaper.
__unhash_process() relies on the "->child_reaper == parent"
check, but this check does not work if the last exiting task
is also the child reaper.
As Eric sugested, we can change __unhash_process() to use the
parent's pid_ns and remove this code.
Also, with this change we can move detach_pid(PIDTYPE_PID) back,
where it was before the previous fix.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 10 ++--------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 4fd4c55..ab972a7 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk);
static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
{
nr_threads--;
+ detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
if (group_dead) {
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID);
@@ -78,13 +79,12 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PID_NS)) {
struct task_struct *parent = p->real_parent;
- if ((task_active_pid_ns(p)->child_reaper == parent) &&
+ if ((task_active_pid_ns(parent)->child_reaper == parent) &&
list_empty(&parent->children) &&
(parent->flags & PF_EXITING))
wake_up_process(parent);
}
}
- detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
list_del_rcu(&p->thread_group);
}
@@ -731,12 +731,6 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns);
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
- /*
- * We can not clear ->child_reaper or leave it alone.
- * There may by stealth EXIT_DEAD tasks on ->children,
- * forget_original_parent() must move them somewhere.
- */
- pid_ns->child_reaper = init_pid_ns.child_reaper;
} else if (father->signal->has_child_subreaper) {
struct task_struct *reaper;
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists