[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530182247.GA28341@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:22:49 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/35] autonuma: define _PAGE_NUMA_PTE and _PAGE_NUMA_PMD
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 07:02:08PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> We will set these bitflags only when the pmd and pte is non present.
>
> They work like PROT_NONE but they identify a request for the numa
> hinting page fault to trigger.
>
> Because we want to be able to set these bitflag in any established pte
> or pmd (while clearing the present bit at the same time) without
> losing information, these bitflags must never be set when the pte and
> pmd are present.
>
> For _PAGE_NUMA_PTE the pte bitflag used is _PAGE_PSE, which cannot be
> set on ptes and it also fits in between _PAGE_FILE and _PAGE_PROTNONE
> which avoids having to alter the swp entries format.
>
> For _PAGE_NUMA_PMD, we use a reserved bitflag. pmds never contain
> swap_entries but if in the future we'll swap transparent hugepages, we
> must keep in mind not to use the _PAGE_UNUSED2 bitflag in the swap
> entry format and to start the swap entry offset above it.
>
> PAGE_UNUSED2 is used by Xen but only on ptes established by ioremap,
> but it's never used on pmds so there's no risk of collision with Xen.
Thank you for loking at this from the xen side. The interesting thing
is that I believe the _PAGE_PAT (or _PAGE_PSE) is actually used on
Xen on PTEs. It is used to mark the pages WC. <sigh>
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> index b74cac9..6e2d954 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,17 @@
> #define _PAGE_FILE (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_FILE)
> #define _PAGE_PROTNONE (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << _PAGE_BIT_PROTNONE)
>
> +/*
> + * Cannot be set on pte. The fact it's in between _PAGE_FILE and
> + * _PAGE_PROTNONE avoids having to alter the swp entries.
> + */
> +#define _PAGE_NUMA_PTE _PAGE_PSE
> +/*
> + * Cannot be set on pmd, if transparent hugepages will be swapped out
> + * the swap entry offset must start above it.
> + */
> +#define _PAGE_NUMA_PMD _PAGE_UNUSED2
> +
> #define _PAGE_TABLE (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_USER | \
> _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
> #define _KERNPG_TABLE (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_ACCESSED | \
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists