linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 May 2012 14:41:22 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, hughd@...gle.com,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing

On Wed, 30 May 2012, kosaki.motohiro@...il.com wrote:

> refcount will be decreased even though was not increased whenever alloc_page_vma()
> is called. As you know, mere mbind(MPOL_MF_MOVE) calls alloc_page_vma().

Most of these issues are about memory migration and shared memory. If we
exempt shared memory from memory migration (after all that shared memory
has its own distinct memory policies already!) then a lot of these issues
wont arise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/