linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/35] autonuma: define _PAGE_NUMA_PTE and _PAGE_NUMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120530200150.GA30148@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2012 16:01:51 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/35] autonuma: define _PAGE_NUMA_PTE and _PAGE_NUMA_PMD

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Thank you for loking at this from the xen side. The interesting thing
> > is that I believe the _PAGE_PAT (or _PAGE_PSE) is actually used on
> > Xen on PTEs. It is used to mark the pages WC. <sigh>
> 
> Oops, I'm using _PAGE_PSE too on the pte, but only when it's unmapped.
> 
> static inline int pte_numa(pte_t pte)
> {
> 	return (pte_flags(pte) &
> 		(_PAGE_NUMA_PTE|_PAGE_PRESENT)) == _PAGE_NUMA_PTE;
> }
> 
> And _PAGE_UNUSED2 (_PAGE_IOMAP) is used for the pmd but _PAGE_IOMAP by
> Xen should only be set on ptes.
<nods>
> 
> The only way to use _PAGE_PSE safe on the pte is if the pte is
> non-present, is this what Xen is also doing? (in turn colliding with
> pte_numa)

The only time the _PAGE_PSE (_PAGE_PAT) is set is when
_PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PWT are set. It is this ugly transformation
of doing:

 if (pat_enabled && _PAGE_PWT | _PAGE_PCD)
	pte = ~(_PAGE_PWT | _PAGE_PCD) | _PAGE_PAT;

and then writting the pte with the 7th bit set instead of the
2nd and 3rd to mark it as WC. There is a corresponding reverse too
(to read the pte - so the pte_val calls) - so if _PAGE_PAT is
detected it will remove the _PAGE_PAT and return the PTE as
if it had _PAGE_PWT | _PAGE_PCD.

So that little bit of code will need some tweaking - as it does
that even if _PAGE_PRESENT is not set. Meaning it would
transform your _PAGE_PAT to _PAGE_PWT | _PAGE_PCD. Gah!


> 
> Now if I shrink the size of the page_autonuma to one entry per pmd
> (instead of per pte) I may as well drop pte_numa entirely and only
> leave pmd_numa. At the moment it's possible to switch between the two
> models at runtime with sysctl (if one wants to do a more expensive
> granular tracking). I'm still uncertain on the best way to shrink
> the page_autonuma size we'll see.

OK. I can whip up a patch to deal with the 'Gah!' case easily if needed.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/