[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530205523.GD30148@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:55:24 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/35] autonuma: alloc/free/init sched_autonuma
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 07:02:22PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> This is where the dynamically allocated sched_autonuma structure is
> being handled.
>
> The reason for keeping this outside of the task_struct besides not
> using too much kernel stack, is to only allocate it on NUMA
> hardware. So the not NUMA hardware only pays the memory of a pointer
> in the kernel stack (which remains NULL at all times in that case).
>
> If the kernel is compiled with CONFIG_AUTONUMA=n, not even the pointer
> is allocated on the kernel stack of course.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/fork.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 237c34e..d323eb1 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static void account_kernel_stack(struct thread_info *ti, int account)
> void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> account_kernel_stack(tsk->stack, -1);
> + free_sched_autonuma(tsk);
> free_thread_info(tsk->stack);
> rt_mutex_debug_task_free(tsk);
> ftrace_graph_exit_task(tsk);
> @@ -260,6 +261,8 @@ void __init fork_init(unsigned long mempages)
> /* do the arch specific task caches init */
> arch_task_cache_init();
>
> + sched_autonuma_init();
> +
> /*
> * The default maximum number of threads is set to a safe
> * value: the thread structures can take up at most half
> @@ -292,21 +295,21 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
> struct thread_info *ti;
> unsigned long *stackend;
> int node = tsk_fork_get_node(orig);
> - int err;
>
> tsk = alloc_task_struct_node(node);
> - if (!tsk)
> + if (unlikely(!tsk))
> return NULL;
>
> ti = alloc_thread_info_node(tsk, node);
> - if (!ti) {
> - free_task_struct(tsk);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> + if (unlikely(!ti))
Should those "unlikely" have their own commit? Did you
run this with the likely/unlikely tracer to confirm that it
does give a sppedup?
> + goto out_task_struct;
>
> - err = arch_dup_task_struct(tsk, orig);
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> + if (unlikely(arch_dup_task_struct(tsk, orig)))
> + goto out_thread_info;
> +
> + if (unlikely(alloc_sched_autonuma(tsk, orig, node)))
> + /* free_thread_info() undoes arch_dup_task_struct() too */
> + goto out_thread_info;
>
> tsk->stack = ti;
>
> @@ -334,8 +337,9 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
>
> return tsk;
>
> -out:
> +out_thread_info:
> free_thread_info(ti);
> +out_task_struct:
> free_task_struct(tsk);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists