[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC59644.6060106@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:38:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 trampoline rework for 3.5
On 05/29/2012 08:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I didn't see any git silent mis-merges, though. The fact that that
> relocs.c file had come in two different ways did make for a more
> interesting merge, since it didn't have any common ancestry - just two
> different original versions. But git seemed to do the right thing, and
> marked where they differed.
>
I don't know why, but when I did a test merge of my original branch into
top of your tree, it silently merged everything (no markings) but
incorrectly.
Perhaps it is a git version-specific thing.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists