[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA9_cmfPXrx-DAA2oSH+ZvrLTvZsT8g0O3jNMT5ZnA8Z_GWTMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:00:43 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: walt <w41ter@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: fix async probe regression
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, walt <w41ter@...il.com> wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 10:55 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Commit a7a20d1 "[SCSI] sd: limit the scope of the async probe domain"
>> moved sd probe work out of reach of wait_for_device_probe(). Allow it
>> to be synced via scsi_complete_async_scans().
>
> Hi Dan. After applying version 2 of a7a20d1 I can boot again, but there's
> a catch :)
Ah you took me off the cc, so I missed this originally.
>
> My grub.cfg boot menu entry uses the root=PARTUUID=<guid> syntax, but that
> has stopped working. After a7a20d1(v2) I have to use root=/dev/sda5 or I
> get the familiar "can't find block device (foo,bar)" kernel panic.
What is a7a20d1(v2)? That's the original commit that broke things, so
I'm confused.
> Any idea what would cause that particular kind of breakage?
The fix should be equivalent for both root= options because if the
device can be found by /dev/sda5 I don't see anything related to the
async subsystem that would prevent it from being looked up by uuid??
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists