linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: sock: validate data_len before allocating skb in sock_alloc_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FC708EE.2020908@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 14:00:14 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sock: validate data_len before allocating skb in
 sock_alloc_send_pskb()

On 05/30/2012 03:02 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:46:23 +0200
>
>> Why doing this test in the while (1) block, it should be done before the
>> loop...
>>
>> Or even in the caller, note net/unix/af_unix.c does this right.
>>
>>          if (len>  SKB_MAX_ALLOC)
>>                  data_len = min_t(size_t,
>>                                   len - SKB_MAX_ALLOC,
>>                                   MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>>          skb = sock_alloc_send_pskb(sk, len - data_len, data_len,
>>                                     msg->msg_flags&  MSG_DONTWAIT,&err);
> My impression is that the callers should be fixed to.  It makes no sense
> to penalize the call sites that get this right.
>
> And yes, if we do check it in sock_alloc_send_pskb() it should be done
> at function entry, not inside the loop.

Sure, so is it ok for me to send a V2 that just do the fixing in 
sock_alloc_sned_pskb() as it's simple and easy to be accepted by stable 
version?

For the fix of callers, I want to post fixes on top as I find there's 
some code duplication of {tun|macvtap|packet}_alloc_skb() and I want to 
unify them to a common helper in sock.c. Then I can fix this issue in 
the new helper.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/