[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC711A5.4090003@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 02:37:25 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...e.cz, bsingharora@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] meminfo: show /proc/meminfo base on container's memcg
(5/31/12 2:28 AM), David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
>>> An application should always know the cgroup that its attached to and be
>>> able to read its state using the command that I gave earlier.
>>
>> No. you don't need why userland folks want namespaces. Even though you don't
>> need namespaces. It doesn't good reason to refuse another use case.
>>
>
> This is tangent to the discussion, we need to revisit why an application
> other than a daemon managing a set of memcgs would ever need to know the
> information in /proc/meminfo. No use-case was ever presented in the
> changelog and its not clear how this is at all relevant. So before
> changing the kernel, please describe how this actually matters in a real-
> world scenario.
Huh? Don't you know a meanings of a namespace ISOLATION? isolation mean,
isolated container shouldn't be able to access global information. If you
want to lean container/namespace concept, tasting openvz or solaris container
is a good start.
But anyway, I dislike current implementaion. So, I NAK this patch too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists