| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4FC7289D.2080009@intel.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:15:25 +0800 From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> CC: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions On 05/30/2012 06:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote: >> On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote: >> >>> >>>>>> s/return/Returns >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for comments! >>>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't >>>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set. >>>> So something like: >>>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style. >>> Is the following new update patch ok? >> >> >> Any further comments for this patch? :) > > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> Thanks! Does someone like to pick up this patch? :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists