linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120531182451.ad63c2bf993ce2f5400896a0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 18:24:51 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree

Hi Johannes,

On Thu, 31 May 2012 09:25:05 +0200 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:13:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
> > mm/memcontrol.c between commit 78ccf5b5ab83 ("mm: memcg: print statistics
> > directly to seq_file") and others from Linus' tree and commit "memcg: add
> > mlock statistic in memory.stat" from the akpm tree.
> > 
> > I just dropped the akpm patch for now.
> 
> Thanks, Stephen.
> 
> However, the patch is known to be broken and, according to mm-commits,
> was removed from -mm on May 16 already.  How'd it reappear?

Andrew only send me a new set of patches at irregular intervals, in this
case the last set arrived on May 10/11.  I just keep rebasing the patches
until Andrew sends me a new set (Andrew: big hint :-)).

I will remove that patch tomorrow in any case.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped