linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-net: remove useless disable on freeze

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120531084717.GB32310@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 11:47:18 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-net: remove useless disable on freeze

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:35:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 19:41:47 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:25 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:19:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > disable_cb is just an optimization: it
> > > > can not guarantee that there are no callbacks.
> > > > 
> > > > I didn't yet figure out whether a callback
> > > > in freeze will trigger a bug, but disable_cb
> > > > won't address it in any case. So let's remove
> > > > the useless calls as a first step.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > > 
> > > Looks like this isn't in the 3.5 pull request -
> > > just lost in the shuffle?
> > > disable_cb is advisory so can't be relied upon.
> > 
> > I always (try to?) reply as I accept patches.
> > 
> > This one did slip by, but it's harmless so no need to push AFAICT.
> > 
> > Applied.
> 
> This patch exists in two trees in linux-next already ... Davem's net tree
> (so presumably he will send it to Linus shortly) and Michael's vhost tree
> (is that tree needed any more?).

Yes and I dropped the patch from there, just did not push yet.

>  Presumably it is now also in the rr
> tree?
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/