[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC732F5.6080706@parallels.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:59:33 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<mhocko@...e.cz>, <bsingharora@...il.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] meminfo: show /proc/meminfo base on container's memcg
On 05/31/2012 12:51 PM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>> One think to keep in mind: A file in memcg does not need to follow the
>> same format
>> of /proc/meminfo so we can bind mount. We should be able to
>> reconstruct that in
>> userspace based on information available from the kernel. You can
>> even collect that
>> from multiple locations, and *then* you bind mount.
>
> I'm sorry I couldn't fully understand. Could you explain more ?
> Do you mean
> - bind mount memory cgroup directory into the container for exporting
> information
> - Some user-space apps, FUSE-procfs or some, can provide enough
> information
>
Implementation details aside, the idea is to have something like FUSE to
hook the read(), and then construct the information it needs to present
in the proper format.
Alternatively, for files that doesn't change a lot, you can create a
file /container-storage-area/my_copy_of_meminfo at container creation,
and bind mount *that* file.
There is no reason to bind mount a kernel-provided file directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists