[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338465354.2760.1336.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:55:54 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: annotate tty_lock() for lockdep
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 17:01 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
>
>
> > =============================================
> > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> > 3.4.0-08218-gb48b2c3 #7 Not tainted
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > blogd/279 is trying to acquire lock:
> > (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8150f51e>] tty_lock+0x3e/0x90
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8150f51e>] tty_lock+0x3e/0x90
> >
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> > Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >
> > CPU0
> > ----
> > lock(&tty->legacy_mutex);
> > lock(&tty->legacy_mutex);
> >
> > *** DEADLOCK ***
> >
>
> I saw a similar problem and applied your patch, but that doesnt seem to
> help me.
I was not aware of Jiri patch
Try this one instead :
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/31/125
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists