linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tty: add lockdep annotations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1338465578.2760.1340.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 13:59:38 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: add lockdep annotations

On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 13:45 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > 
> > tty_lock_pair() do the right thing to avoid deadlocks, but should
> > instruct LOCKDEP of this to avoid a splat. 
> 
> I have submitted very similar patch to Greg/Alan already 3 days ago[1], 
> but have been told that this is already fixed. Apparently it wasn't?
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/28/226

I saw that right now.

Not sure your patch is the right fix with hard coded 1 and 2 values ?

0 and 1 should be enough.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/