linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: add extension API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 14:04:56 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
Cc:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: add extension API

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:50:00PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:

> Now the question is should we extend the Linux device structure to
> handle such HW IP, or should we extend the clock definition to
> handle this kind of extended clock node.

> It looks to me that this kind of function does belong to the device
> more than to the clock node.

This is looking a lot like what power domains do to me...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/