[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120531131106.GF2666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:11:06 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: add extension API
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 03:07:53PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 5/31/2012 3:04 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:50:00PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> >>It looks to me that this kind of function does belong to the device
> >>more than to the clock node.
> >This is looking a lot like what power domains do to me...
> Do you mean the reset part?
Yes, the general "this block goes into an idle state and so we need to
rebuild/reset the state of the things in it afterwards" thing.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists