[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49k3zscuk2.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:08:13 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Cc: ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-aio@...ck.org, mfasheh@...e.com,
jlbec@...lplan.org, bcrl@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, joe.jin@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] aio: make kiocb->private NUll in init_sync_kiocb()
Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com> writes:
> Ocfs2 uses kiocb.*private as a flag of unsigned long size. In
> commit a11f7e6 ocfs2: serialize unaligned aio, the unaligned
> io flag is involved in it to serialize the unaligned aio. As
> *private is not initialized in init_sync_kiocb() of do_sync_write(),
> this unaligned io flag may be unexpectly set in an aligned dio.
> And this will cause OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_unaligned_aio decreased
> to -1 in ocfs2_dio_end_io(), thus the following unaligned dio
> will hang forever at ocfs2_aiodio_wait() in ocfs2_file_write_iter().
> We can't initialized this flag in ocfs2_file_write_iter() since
> it may be invoked several times by do_sync_write(). So we initialize
> it in init_sync_kiocb(), it's also useful for other similiar use of
> it in the future.
I don't see any ocfs2_file_write_iter in the upstream kernel.
ocfs2_file_aio_write most certainly could set ->private to 0, it
will only be called once for a given kiocb.
That point aside, I have no issues with setting private to NULL in
init_sync_kiocb. If you fix up the comment to reflect reality
w.r.t. the upstream kernel source, I'll ack the patch.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists