[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338474158.13348.346.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:22:38 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] uprobes/core: Remove redundant lock_page/unlock_page
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 13:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 17:16 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > No need to lock the page when copying the opcode in read_opcode().
>
> It would be good if the changelog said _why_ this is so :-)
I thought the same thing when I read it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists