[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338486283.28384.95.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 19:44:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: Synchronize variable setting with
breakpoints
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 19:40 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:08 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Also, why does this stuff live in ftrace? I always thought you were
> > > going to replace text_poke() so everybody that uses cross-modifying code
> > > could profit?
> >
> > I discussed this with Masami at Collaboration Summit. The two are
> > similar but also very different. But we want to start merging the two
> > together where it makes sense.
>
> Argh,. I so disagree. You're doing it backwards.
>
> First you merge whatever is there, regardless of who came first.
The thing is, that's useful even if the new stuff never works. Having
two code-bases doing cross-modifying code in different ways just doesn't
sound right. That stuff is tricky enough as it is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists