[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338492393.13348.385.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:26:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Reset the debug_stack update counter
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 12:19 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 06:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c index
> > 9087527..c1fffc5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c +++
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c @@ -450,8 +450,10 @@ static inline void
> > nmi_nesting_preprocess(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >
> > static inline void nmi_nesting_postprocess(void) { - if
> > (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) + if
> > (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack))) {
> > debug_stack_reset(); + __get_cpu_var(update_debug_stack) = 0; + }
> > } #endif
> >
>
> Please don't use __get_cpu_var(); it causes a pointer to be manifest,
> which is free or almost free on most architectures but quite expensive
> on x86.
>
> Instead use this_cpu_read()/this_cpu_write().
OK, will change.
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists