lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:48:51 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>,
	Mattias WALLIN <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect
 Device Tree

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:36:28PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote:

> This:

> >sdi@...26000 {
> >         vmmc-supply = <&ab8500_ldo_aux3_reg>;
> >};

> Is the same as, and will cause no more issues than:

> >static struct regulator_consumer_supply ab8500_vaux3_consumers[] = {
> >        REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vmmc", "sdi0"),
> >};

> ... because only nodes which we care about (dictated by compatible
> declaration protections) will be parsed. So different platforms will
> not affect each other.

What makes you say the two are equivalent?  The former is a reference
from a consumer device to a named regulator while the latter is a
reference from a regulator to a named consumer.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ