[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120601091319.31979.93871.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:43:28 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mingo@...nel.org, yong.zhang0@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 14/27] ia64: Move holding of vector_lock to
__setup_vector_irq()
__setup_vector_irq() expects that its caller holds the vector_lock.
As of now there is only one caller - smp_callin(); and acquiring the lock
in smp_callin() around the call to __setup_vector_irq() obstructs the
conversion of ia64 to generic smp booting code. So move the lock acquisition
to __setup_vector_irq() itself (mimicking what x86 does).
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c | 5 +++--
arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
index 5c3e088..6ac99c8 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c
@@ -241,13 +241,13 @@ reserve_irq_vector (int vector)
}
/*
- * Initialize vector_irq on a new cpu. This function must be called
- * with vector_lock held.
+ * Initialize vector_irq on a new cpu.
*/
void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
{
int irq, vector;
+ spin_lock(&vector_lock);
/* Clear vector_irq */
for (vector = 0; vector < IA64_NUM_VECTORS; ++vector)
per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
vector = irq_to_vector(irq);
per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = irq;
}
+ spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
}
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && (defined(CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_IA64_DIG))
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
index df00a3c..709ce07 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -378,10 +378,10 @@ smp_callin (void)
set_numa_node(cpu_to_node_map[cpuid]);
set_numa_mem(local_memory_node(cpu_to_node_map[cpuid]));
- spin_lock(&vector_lock);
/* Setup the per cpu irq handling data structures */
__setup_vector_irq(cpuid);
notify_cpu_starting(cpuid);
+ spin_lock(&vector_lock);
set_cpu_online(cpuid, true);
per_cpu(cpu_state, cpuid) = CPU_ONLINE;
spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists