linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to flexible proportions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1338545638.28384.137.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:13:58 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to
 flexible proportions

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 00:42 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 01-06-12 00:26:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 00:11 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >  bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
> > >  {
> > > -       u64 events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> > > +       u64 events;
> > > +       unsigned long flags;
> > >  
> > > +       local_irq_save(flags);
> > > +       events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> > > +       local_irq_restore(flags);
> > >         /*
> > >          * Don't do anything if there are no events.
> > >          */
> > > @@ -73,7 +77,9 @@ bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
> > >         if (periods < 64)
> > >                 events -= events >> periods;
> > >         /* Use addition to avoid losing events happening between sum and set */
> > > +       local_irq_save(flags);
> > >         percpu_counter_add(&p->events, -events);
> > > +       local_irq_restore(flags);
> > >         p->period += periods;
> > >         write_seqcount_end(&p->sequence); 
> > 
> > Uhm, why bother enabling it in between? Just wrap the whole function in
> > a single IRQ disable.
>   I wanted to have interrupts disabled for as short as possible but if you
> think it doesn't matter, I'll take your advice. The result is attached.

Thing is, disabling interrupts is quite expensive and the extra few
instructions covered isn't much.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/