linux-kernel - Re: seq_file: Use larger buffer to reduce time traversing lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1338552870.2760.1512.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:14:30 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, nstraz@...hat.com
Subject: Re: seq_file: Use larger buffer to reduce time traversing lists

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 14:10 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 11:39 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > I've just been taking a look at the seq_read() code, since we've noticed
> > that dumping files with large numbers of records can take some
> > considerable time. This is due to seq_read() using a buffer which, at
> > most is a single page in size, and that it has to find its place again
> > on every call to seq_read(). That makes it rather inefficient.
> > 
> > As an example, I created a GFS2 filesystem with 100k inodes in it, and
> > then ran ls -l to get a decent number of cached inodes. This result in
> > there being approx 400k lines in the debugfs file containing GFS2's
> > glocks. I then timed how long it takes to read this file:
> > 
> > [root@...woon mnt]# time dd if=/sys/kernel/debug/gfs2/unity\:myfs/glocks
> > of=/dev/null bs=1M
> > 0+5769 records in
> > 0+5769 records out
> > 23273958 bytes (23 MB) copied, 63.3681 s, 367 kB/s
> 
> What time do you get if you do
> 
> time dd if=/sys/kernel/debug/gfs2/unity\:myfs/glocks of=/dev/null bs=4k
> 
> This patch seems the wrong way to me.
> 
> seq_read(size = 1MB) should perform many copy_to_user() calls instead of a single one.
> 
> Instead of doing kmalloc(m->size <<= 1, GFP_KERNEL) each time we overflow the buffer,
> we should flush its content to user space.
> 
> 

by the way, is the following command even working ?

time dd if=/sys/kernel/debug/gfs2/unity\:myfs/glocks of=/dev/null bs=16M

I guess not, it probably returns -ENOMEM



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/