linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm: omap: remove ocp2scp_usb_phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:24:24 +0200
From:	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
To:	"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>
CC:	"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>, <paul@...an.com>,
	<tony@...mide.com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <arnd@...db.de>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm: omap: remove ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick clock node

On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@...com>  wrote:
>> On 5/30/2012 4:51 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@...com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick" clock node was a fake clock node created
>>>> to control MODULEMODE of ocp2scp. Since the hwmod for ocp2scp is now
>>>> added
>>>> (which can be used to control MODULEMODE) this clock node is removed.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@...com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c |   11 -----------
>>>
>>>
>>> Have you patched clock44xx_data.c manually or you have a patch for
>>> the clock_data autogen script to generate it ?
>>
>>
>> I have a series that will remove all these clock nodes. I should be able to
>> post that soon.
>>
>> Potentially at that time, Kishon might be able to drop that patch.
>
> Will you be sending a patch for *[RFC PATCH 1/5] arm: omap: hwmod:
> make *phy_48m* as the main_clk of ocp2scp* also or I have to keep that
> as part of my series?

Good point. In fact, I'm fixing both at the same time to avoid any 
bisect issue.

Regards,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/