[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206010850430.6302@router.home>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:51:21 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: david@...g.hm
cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
hughd@...gle.com, sivanich@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
On Thu, 31 May 2012, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > > > Yes, that's right direction, I think. Currently, shmem_set_policy()
> > > > can't handle
> > > > nonlinear mapping.
> > >
> > > I've been mulling for some time to just remove non linear mappings.
> > > AFAIK they were only useful on 32bit and are obsolete and could be
> > > emulated with VMAs instead.
> >
> > I agree. It is only userful on 32bit and current enterprise users don't use
> > 32bit anymore. So, I don't think emulated by vmas cause user visible issue.
>
> I wish this was true, there are a lot of systems out there still running 32
> bit linux, even on 64 bit capible hardware. This is especially true in
> enterprises where they have either homegrown or proprietary software that
> isn't 64 bit clean.
32 bit binaries (and entire distros) run fine under 64 bit kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists