[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120601155446.51751e61@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:54:46 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Sergey Lapin <slapin@...fans.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lapb-nl: Added driver
On the socket family side I was thinking not of a "lapb-nl" socket layer
but a simple pure LAPB socket - that just uses interface name type
addressing and only supported SOCK_RAW for raw data frames over LAPB
encodings.
> > Again the sl->tty locking needs sorting (I think this may well be true of
> > slip and the others too)
>
> Could you please explain a bit more on this?
In modern kernels the tty object is refcounted and not locked by any big
global locks.
So in your open do
tty = tty_kref_get(tty);
and in the close
tty_kref_put(tty);
and you are guaranteed the tty won't vanish under you between those
points.
> > Why flush ?
> Problems occured a long time ago, will remove and check.
That should be handled by the core code now.
> The whole thing is data packat transfer. Application is also notified when
> packet is delivered. That's it, no fancy stuff. There is also UDP code, but it is
> weird mess, and I think if it is to live or be removed. What do you think?
Weird mess removal is always good stuff.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists