lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:01:37 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, nstraz@...hat.com Subject: Re: seq_file: Use larger buffer to reduce time traversing lists On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 16:57 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > And If someones need 100.000 active unix sockets and fast /proc/net/udp I meant /proc/net/unix here, of course... > file as well, patch is welcome. If I have time I can do it eventually. > All unix sockets are linked into a single list, no hash table, so its not very easy right now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists