[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338564636.2708.75.camel@menhir>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:30:36 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, nstraz@...hat.com
Subject: Re: seq_file: Use larger buffer to reduce time traversing lists
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 17:18 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 17:01 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > All unix sockets are linked into a single list, no hash table, so its
> > not very easy right now.
> >
>
> Oops, there is a hash table, so patch is coming ;)
>
>
The only reason that I looked at the unix sockets was that Nate Straz,
who originally reported the issue to me had sent me a test program for
unix sockets which he wrote in response to one of your earlier emails.
So I converted it to tcp just to do that quick test,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists