linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow nesting of the debug stack IDT setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 22:30:31 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow nesting of the debug stack IDT setting

On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:58 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> > What you have here is a nesting counter, which is good, but I have
> > some objections to the implementation.
> > 
> > The name "debug_idt_zero" doesn't convey a counter in any way, shape
> > or form; perhaps debug_stack_users or something like that.
> 
> Well, it is 'debug_idt_SET_zero' which is what it is doing, regardless
> of counter (see below). But perhaps we should change it to:
> 
> debug_idt_get()
> debug_idt_put()

Bah, silly me, I misunderstood you. You were talking about the counter
itself, not the function names.

OK, will fix.

Thanks,

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/