lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120601210348.GA22471@sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:03:48 -0500
From:	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: relax_domain_level boot parameter has no effect

I noticed (and verified) that the relax_domain_level boot parameter does not
get processed because sched_domain_level_max is 0 at the time that
setup_relax_domain_level() is run.

int sched_domain_level_max;

static int __init setup_relax_domain_level(char *str)
{
        unsigned long val;

        val = simple_strtoul(str, NULL, 0);
        if (val < sched_domain_level_max)
                default_relax_domain_level = val;

        return 1;
}
__setup("relax_domain_level=", setup_relax_domain_level);


struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
..
                sched_domain_level_max = max(sched_domain_level_max, sd->level);
..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ