[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120601210451.GC4258@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 22:04:52 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dt: tegra: cardhu: register core regulator
tps65911
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:44:00PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Could you expand on "named property" a bit; I'm not quite sure what
> you're getting at - literally a property with name "named" (which
> would be the same as regulator-id under just a different property
> name), or ...?
Just a property where we only care about a name (ie, that the property
is present).
> > Can't we use the right hand side of this? It appears to just be
> > syntactic sugar without any current meaning.
> The stuff to the right of @ is the "unit address" and must match the
> value in the reg property. Using that was the first proposal I had
> above (which I also didn't like as much)
The stuff to the left of the @ is just noise right now, though - it has
no meaning currently. It's filled in with "regulator" because we need
to put something there AFAICT.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists