[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120601225754.GA25281@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 00:57:54 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> :
[
> So it goes idle with NET_RX softirq pending. That really should not
> happen. I fear you need to fire up the tracer :)
Can you elaborate what "should not happen" mean ? AFAIU nothing prevents
softirq to be interrupted after NET_RX processing and thus NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
to be pending again before tick_nohz_irq_exit() runs.
Dave can you:
- specify if there much traffic when the message appears
- send /proc/interrupts + ethtool -S ethX
Thanks.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists