[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000201cd3fba$942df840$bc89e8c0$%jun@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:51:23 +0900
From: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
To: merez@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, 'Chris Ball' <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/3] mmc: core: Support packed write command for eMMC4.5
device
Maya Erez <merez@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > @@ -1313,10 +1609,17 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue
> *mq, struct request *rqc)
> > * A block was successfully transferred.
> > */
> > mmc_blk_reset_success(md, type);
> > - spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
> > - ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0,
> > +
> > + if (mq_rq->packed_cmd != MMC_PACKED_NONE) {
> > + ret = mmc_blk_end_packed_req(mq, mq_rq);
> If a specific request in the packed request consistantly fails, there is
> nothing to stop us from sending the same packed request in an endless
> loop.
There is various error case. This patch reused the existing error handling.
What is that case we need to consider?
Best regards,
Seungwon Jeon
> > + break;
>
> Thanks,
> Maya Erez
> Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists