[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwCusEdMq3_3TAXSZ=+kbN7H6AbnngVaagAZw=ZpicckQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:07:35 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> It's still up and in this state if you want me to gather any further info
> before I reboot it.
You seem to have lockdep enabled, since I see the lock information,
but presumably you didn't get a lockdep splat before this?
Also, sysrq-w is usually way more interesting than 't' when there are
processes stuck on a mutex.
Because yes, it looks like you have a boattload of trinity processes
stuck on an inode mutex. Looks like every single one of them is in
'lock_rename()'. It *shouldn't* be an ABBA deadlock, since lockdep
should have noticed that, but who knows.
It looks like the lock information is somewhat truncated. I suspect
the dmesg buffer had filled up with all the task data.
Can you do just "sysrq-d" for the lock information (and maybe
separately "sysrq-w" for the blocked tasks)? The non-truncated lock
data might tell us more.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists