[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbafpAC+DZ71Oon_PyiWGAryAxzZvttpeiFY+A_agYcMFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:54:39 +0300
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com
Cc: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...ricsson.com>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/6] remoteproc: Pass struct fw to load_segments and find_rsc_table.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:26 PM, <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com> wrote:
> From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
>
> Use struct firmware as arguments to functions rproc_find_rcs_table()
> and rproc_load_segments().
I'll keep reading through the patches to get the big picture, but in
general, it's best just to provide the incentive behind every change
in the commit log.
> +rproc_find_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw,
> int *tablesz)
> {
...
> + /*
> + * The ELF entry point is the rproc's boot addr (though this is not
> + * a configurable property of all remote processors: some will always
> + * boot at a specific hardcoded address).
> + */
> + rproc->bootaddr = ehdr->e_entry;
> +
...
> @@ -1032,15 +1039,8 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> - /*
> - * The ELF entry point is the rproc's boot addr (though this is not
> - * a configurable property of all remote processors: some will always
> - * boot at a specific hardcoded address).
> - */
> - rproc->bootaddr = ehdr->e_entry;
Is this change related?
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists