| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvzQtrbrxY478J0bybAWftctBPMXmKOVgguxRHBPtaY_xA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:26:51 +0200 From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: bing deng <deng8bing@...il.com> Cc: Il Han <corone.il.han@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: An uninitialized return value is returned. On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:26 PM, bing deng <deng8bing@...il.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Why not modify "int ret;" to "int ret = 0;"? Below is the benefit: > 1. return the constant 0 as wish. > 2. The variable ret can be used if we want. Why? ret is in vain and wastes memory... -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists