linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: speakup: fixed checkpatch and sparse warnings in selection.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:20:21 +0200
From:	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To:	Chris Yungmann <yungmann.chris@...il.com>
Cc:	w.d.hubbs@...il.com, chris@...-brannons.com, kirk@...ille.uwo.ca,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, speakup@...ille.uwo.ca,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: speakup: fixed checkpatch and sparse warnings
 in selection.c

Chris Yungmann, le Sat 02 Jun 2012 12:32:38 -0500, a écrit :
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ int speakup_paste_selection(struct tty_struct *tty)
>  	while (sel_buffer && sel_buffer_lth > pasted) {
>  		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>  		if (test_bit(TTY_THROTTLED, &tty->flags)) {
> -			if (in_atomic())
> +			if (in_interrupt())
>  				/* if we are in an interrupt handler, abort */
>  				break;
>  			schedule();

I'd rather keep in_atomic(), which is clearly known to be broken (see
TODO above).

Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/