lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 3 Jun 2012 11:23:29 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <>
To:	Dave Jones <>, Hugh Dickins <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <>,
	Kyungmin Park <>,
	Marek Szyprowski <>,
	Mel Gorman <>, Minchan Kim <>,
	Rik van Riel <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Cong Wang <>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <>,,
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170()

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dave Jones <> wrote:
> Things aren't happy with that patch at all.

Yeah, at this point I think we need to just revert the compaction changes.

Guys, what's the minimal set of commits to revert? That clearly buggy
"rescue_unmovable_pageblock()" function was introduced by commit
5ceb9ce6fe94, but is that actually involved with the particular bug?
That commit seems to revert cleanly still, but is that sufficient or
does it even matter?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists